March 14, 2002 (9:53 AM)
Nashville Crayfish
Orconectes shoupi
SPECIES CODE:
K01S I01
STATUS: Endangered throughout its range- U.S.A. (TN) (51 FR 34412, September 26, 1986). Recovery Plan completed in 1988 (Nashville Crayfish Recovery Plan).
SPECIES DESCRIPTION: This pigmented crayfish with well-developed eyes ranges from 1/4 to 7 inches in total length. Like many crayfish, this species probably feeds on a variety of organic material, both vegetation fragments and animal matter (USFWS 1988). The crayfish is a good benthic walker and a good swimmer. The Nashville crayfish is most active in the summer. The crayfish’s activity level is low in the winter, but it does move about under ice (Nature Serve Explorer 2002).
REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT: Reproductive activity begins in spring and egg-laying probably occurs in late winter and early spring (Nature Serve Explorer 2002 and USFWS 1988). Females with eggs and young are found in the spring when they are secluded under large objects (rocks, pieces of metal, and other debris) along the stream banks (USFWS 1988). Females brood eggs below the abdomen. Young are released early in the summer (Nature Serve Explorer 2002).
RANGE AND POPULATION LEVEL: The Nashville crayfish is currently known only
from Mill Creek and six of its tributaries in Davidson and Williamson Counties,
Tennessee (O’Bara et al. 1985, Bouchard 1984).
The crayfish
continues to exist in six Mill Creek tributaries: Sevenmile Creek, Sims Branch,
Whittemore Branch, Indian Creek, Owl Creek, and Edmonson Branch. All tributary
populations except Sevenmile Creek are concentrated near the creek mouths (O’Bara et al. 1985, Bouchard 1984).
HABITAT: The
Nashville crayfish has been observed to inhabit pools and riffle areas with
moderate current (USFWS 1986). The substrate of the animal’s main
habitat, Mill Creek, is mainly bedrock which is covered in some areas with
gravel and scattered limestone slabs. The pools, backwater areas, and stream
margins are covered with silt and sand.
Riverweed (Podostemum sp.) occurs on rocks in some swift water
areas, and water willow (Justicia sp.) occurs along some shallow gravel
shoals. Much of the stream bank is vegetated with trees and shrubs (Bouchard
1976). The Nashville crayfish has been found in a wide range of environments
including gravel and cobble runs, pools with up to 10 centimeters (cm) of
settled sediment, and under slabrocks and other cover (the largest crayfish are
usually under cover) (USFWS 1988). The
species is highly photosensitive and is usually found under cover during the
day (Bouchard 1976). Canopy cover appears important, as O’Bara et al. (1985) reported that all sites they sampled had
canopy cover of 60 to 90 percent. The
species has been found in small pools where the flow was intermittent (Stark
1986, Miller and Hartfield 1985). Gravel-cobble substrate provides good cover
for juveniles (Stark 1986, Miller and Hartfield 1985). Females seek out large
slabrocks when they are carrying eggs and young. These secluded places are also
needed for molting (USFWS 1988).
The animal’s need for clean, high quality water is strongly indicated, despite the fact that it can exist (no data on how long) in polluted‑by‑silt situations (Nature Serve Explorer 2002). The Nashville crayfish requires nonturbid, well‑oxygenated water and clean substrate.
PAST THREATS: The species is threatened by siltation, stream alterations, urban runoff, and general water quality deterioration resulting from development pressures in the urbanized areas surrounding Nashvi1le, Tennessee. The species’ 1imited distribution also makes it vulnerable to a single catastrophic event, such as a toxic chemical spill or other contamination (USFWS 1986). The species is endangered by water quality and other habitat deterioration from development within the watershed. The U.S. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers (COE) concluded in 1981 that the uppermost segment of Mill Creek was degraded by organic enrichment and had very poor water quality (USFWS 1986).
The Nashville crayfish’s restricted range makes it very vulnerable to a single catastrophic event, such as a chemical spill. COE (1984) reported that occasional spills and discharges have occurred along Mill Creek in the past (USFWS 1986).
CURRENT THREATS:
The Nashville crayfish is endangered by water quality
deterioration from development within the watershed. The Nashville crayfish’s restricted range makes it very vulnerable to a single
catastrophic event such as a chemical spill (USFWS 1988).
Much of the Mill Creek system is
within the Nashville City limits and water quality degradation in this area
does not appear to have reduced the range of the Nashville crayfish.
Threats to the species could also come
from other activities in the watershed such as road and bridge construction,
stream channel modifications, impoundments, land use changes and other
projects, if such activities are not planned and implemented with the survival
of this geographically restricted species in mind (USFWS 1986).
Crayfish are frequently taken in the
southeastern United States for food or bait. Overutilization for these purposes
could become a problem if the species’ specific
habitat were identified to the extent required for designation of critical
habitat (USFWS 1986).
CONSERVATION MEASURES:
LITERATURE CITED:
Bouchard, R.W. 1976. Investigations on the status of
fourteen species of freshwater decapod crustaceans in the United States, Part
I. Troglobitic shrimp and western North
American crayfishes. Report to Office of
Endangered Species, Department of the Interior. 26 pp.
Bouchard, R.W. 1984. Distribution and
status of the endangered crayfish Orconectes shoupi (Decapoda:
Cambaridae). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Tennessee Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Tennessee Tech University,
Cookeville, Tennessee. 27 pp.
Miller, A. C. and P. D. Hartfield. 1985. A study of Orconectes shoupi, Mill Creek Basin, Tennessee, 1985. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nashville, TN. 25 pp.
Miller, A.C., P.D. Hartfield, L.
Rhodes. 1990. An investigation of Orconectes shoupi in Mill and Seven Mile
creeks, Tennessee. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 65(1):21‑24.
Nature Serve Explorer. An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. 2001. Version 1.6. Arlington, Virginia, USA: Nature Serve. Available: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer (Accessed: March 13, 2002).
O’Bara, C.
J., A. J. Korgi, and G. J. Stark. 1985. Final report, status survey of the
Nashville crayfish (Orconectes shoupi). Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Asheville, NC. 17 pp.
Stark, G. J. 1986. Microhabitat use by the crayfish community of the Mill Creek Basin. Thesis, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN. 44 pp.
Tennessee Department of Public Health. 1978. Mill Creek survey, Davidson County, Tennessee. Division of Water Quality Control, Nashville Basin. Unpublished report. 7 pp.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nashville District. 1981. Water quality along Mill Creek. Nashville, Tennessee. 35 pp.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Nashville District. 1984. Mill Creek, Wimpole Drive area, Nashville, Davidson
County, Tennessee. Final detailed
project report and environmental assessment. 331 pp.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1986.
Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of endangered
status for the Nashville crayfish. 51
Federal Register 34412.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
1988. Nashville crayfish Recovery Plan
(1st revision). U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Atlanta, Georgia. 16 pp.